From: John Matus (jmatus@pacbell.net)
Date: Sun Oct 17 2004 - 18:13:10 GMT-3
interface Serial0/0
ip address 132.1.0.4 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
frame-relay interface-dlci 401
frame-relay interface-dlci 402
frame-relay interface-dlci 403
frame-relay lmi-type cisco
that is the config for 4 routers in the frame cloud.......frame inverse-arp
is on by default..........<?>
Regards,
John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>; "lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: weird inverse-arp problem
> Hey John,
>
> Could you post your config's?
>
> Off-hand, the 1 thing that comes to mind is that if the routers were
> config'd with "no fram inv", then the local router would send out inverse
> arp requests, but the remote routers wouldn't respond.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>
> To: "lab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 3:32 PM
> Subject: weird inverse-arp problem
>
>
>> i was setting up a frame network w/ inverse-arp <lab scenario> and had
> enabled
>> frame-relay encapsulation on the natural interfaces and waited to see the
>> dynamic mappings come to life, but nothing. so after 10 minutes i
>> decided
> to
>> use the 'frame interface dlci' command on the interfaces and viola, the
>> mapping instantly came up.....
>> from my understanding this is not supposed to be necessary to form
>> dynamic
>> pvc's........or am i wrong???
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> John D. Matus
>> MCSE, CCNP
>> Office: 818-782-2061
>> Cell: 818-430-8372
>> jmatus@pacbell.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:49 GMT-3