RE: Cisco Removes VoIP ?'s from R&S

From: Elliott Reyes (elliottreyes@adelphia.net)
Date: Sat Oct 09 2004 - 13:27:11 GMT-3

• Next message: Swaroop Potdar: "RE: DHCP problem"
• Previous message: none: "BE and BC with respect to CAR and Two Rate policers"
• Maybe in reply to: Mark Lasarko: "Cisco Removes VoIP ?'s from R&S"
• Next in thread: Ludwig Morales: "Re: Cisco Removes VoIP ?'s from R&S"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Amen,

I just bought a 1 nmv and 2 FXS a month ago.

E

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 8:17 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Cisco Removes VoIP ?'s from R&S

At 11:06 AM -0400 10/9/04, Tom Larus wrote:
>
>I have considered buying ATM equipment so I can write some
>full-blown CCIE practice labs, but I have been concerned that if I
>buy ATM equipment, Cisco will take it off the lab the day after I
>put it in my rack.
>
>

Buy some Automatic Teller Machines instead. They are even more fun than
voice.

• Next message: Swaroop Potdar: "RE: DHCP problem"
• Previous message: none: "BE and BC with respect to CAR and Two Rate policers"
• Maybe in reply to: Mark Lasarko: "Cisco Removes VoIP ?'s from R&S"
• Next in thread: Ludwig Morales: "Re: Cisco Removes VoIP ?'s from R&S"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:45 GMT-3