From: Matthew Seppeler (Matt.Seppeler@InetX.com)
Date: Fri Oct 08 2004 - 00:48:59 GMT-3
From the sounds of it, it sounds like you had at least full IP
reachability which means you probably nailed the basic layer 2 and 3
stuff. If you can remember some of the sections well enough where they
marked you off in that you felt were correct, I would say go for it. I
was in a similar situation you were in when I took my 1st attempt and
wish I at least tried the challenge. I could not calculate the exact
score but felt I was off by about 4 points.
___________________
Here is a question on the regrade for anyone that may know to answer.
If you fork over another $300 to Cisco to regrade you and they fail you
on the regrade, do they at least give you the percentage that you got on
each section or do they just fail you and thank you for your money? If
they give you the percentage, that may help in giving you a better idea
of some of the sections that you felt confident in that you may need to
revisit.
Matt Seppeler
Email: mseppeler@inetx.com
-----Original Message-----
From: richardd@mi.madritel.es [mailto:richardd@mi.madritel.es]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1:36 PM
To: Joe Rothstein; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Lab exam remark
Personally I would concentrate on the next attempt. The probability of
passing on a regrade is so low.
>
> De: Joe Rothstein <ziutek@mac.com>
> Fecha: 2004/10/06 mii PM 04:39:29 GMT+02:00
> Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Asunto: Lab exam remark
>
> Just curious what people's opinions are on having failed attempts
> remarked.
>
> I recently failed on my second attempt, and know that several of the
> sections I lost points in worked flawlessly (I had more than two hours
> to check, recheck, test, and retest, even ran a ping script), and did
> not violate any of the requirements of those tasks. I figure I may
have
> failed by less than five points, and can easily find those point in
> three or four sections were I lost them.
>
> Any suggestions or remarks would be very welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Joe
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:45 GMT-3