From: Radz KL (radzkl@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Oct 01 2004 - 22:05:24 GMT-3
usually, the scenario is that there is a trunk between a router interface and a switch interface. u configure compatible encap on both sides n both ends can ping each other etc.
i'm not able to understand what happens when a router and a switch are connected and the router port belongs to a vlan and the switch interface is routed and is not a trunk.
Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> wrote:
Sounds like a typo on the switch.
You are reciving a packet tagged with ID 384, and you are expecting ID 38.
The "colour" is just a name for the different vlans. ISL tags each
packet with the vlan ID it belongs to, and the router is upset because
it has no subinterface defined for vlan ID 384.
Radz KL wrote:
> hi,
>
> im getting this error on the router:
>
> *Mar 1 02:58:32.487: vLAN: ISL packet received bearing colour ID 384 on FastEthernet0/1 which has no subinterface configured to route or bridge ID 384.
>
> router config is:
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0.38
> encapsulation isl 38
> ip address 162.1.38.3 255.255.255.0
>
> other end connects to a 3550 fasteth routed intf.
>
> i don't think i'm getting how this thing works...can someone pls suggest a doc that will explain this.
>
> radz
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:42 GMT-3