From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@huapi.ba.ar)
Date: Fri Sep 24 2004 - 07:11:33 GMT-3
This network is already in RIP w/o redistribution.
AFAIK, there is no way of not letting RIP know directly about it, cause
there is no network mask for the rip protocol.
If what you want is for it to "behave as", then an offset list could help.
mani poopal wrote:
> Hi Group,
>
> Assume following configuration. R1 is running EIGRP, R2 running RIP and EIGRP and R3 running RIP.
> R1 R2 R3
> -------135.15.1.0/24---------------------------------135.15.3.0/24---------
> EIGRP EIGRP&RIP RIP
>
> Redistribution is happening at R2.
>
> R2 configuration:
> router rip
> network 135.15.0.0
> redistribute eigrp 100 metric 5
>
> router eigrp 100
> network 135.15.3.0 0.0.0.255
> redistribute rip metric 1000 1 250 100 1500
>
> Question: Even before redistribution 135.15.1.0 network apperas in the R3 routing table as a RIP route with a metric of one. After the redistribution, still the network apperas with metric of one not five(R3 thinks route as RIP learned route(same major network) and not redistributed eigrp route. How can we make this network appera as eigrp redistributed network(RIP metric 5). In the RIP process if we deny with distribute-list command this network will not visible even with redistribution. Any suggestion is appreciated.
>
> thanks
>
> Mani
>
>
>
> B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
> (416)431 9929
> MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:48 GMT-3