From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Thu Sep 23 2004 - 20:23:23 GMT-3
At 1:49 PM -0400 9/23/04, ccie2be wrote:
>I'm pretty sure that the more specific statement won't be processed as those
>interfaces found by the less specific statement will already be assigned to
>area 0.
>
>In the lab, I recommend that you avoid this issue altogether by assinging
>your interfaces with very specific statements. Why even take a chance of
>making a mistake?
Very wise words.
>
>HTH, Tim
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <duncan5322@bellsouth.net>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:28 PM
>Subject: OSPF Question
>
>
>> Could someone help me with this?
>> Let's say I have this config.
>>
>> ROUTER OSPF 10
>> network 172.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
>>
>>
>> and I add:
>> network 172.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
>>
>> which area will 172.1.1.0 be advertised in? Will the more specific
>statement override the more general one even though it comes later in the
>config?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:48 GMT-3