From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Sep 23 2004 - 14:49:42 GMT-3
I'm pretty sure that the more specific statement won't be processed as those
interfaces found by the less specific statement will already be assigned to
area 0.
In the lab, I recommend that you avoid this issue altogether by assinging
your interfaces with very specific statements. Why even take a chance of
making a mistake?
HTH, Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: <duncan5322@bellsouth.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:28 PM
Subject: OSPF Question
> Could someone help me with this?
> Let's say I have this config.
>
> ROUTER OSPF 10
> network 172.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
>
>
> and I add:
> network 172.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
>
> which area will 172.1.1.0 be advertised in? Will the more specific
statement override the more general one even though it comes later in the
config?
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:48 GMT-3