Re: Cisco R/S Practice Lab6 (Pg. 371): port-priority

From: Charles Sun (wanwalker2000@yahoo.ca)
Date: Tue Sep 21 2004 - 05:25:59 GMT-3

• Next message: Dalu-Chandu, Jay: "RE: FRF.16 (Multilink Frame-Relay)"
• Previous message: C&S Groupstudy: "RE: FRF.16 (Multilink Frame-Relay)"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Ding: "Cisco R/S Practice Lab6 (Pg. 371): port-priority"
• Next in thread: mani poopal: "RE: Cisco R/S Practice Lab6 (Pg. 371): port-priority"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Yes, if sw1 is the root switch for vlan_100. If you can post the scenario, it will be easy to discribe.

Peter Ding <pding@cisco.com> wrote:The requiement is to configure the sw1 and sw2 such that you will have the
traffic related to vlan_100 pass primarily through fa0/15 trunk port
........(pg. 371)

The solution on pg. 371 is the use of spanning-tree vlan port-priority
command on both sides (both trunks).

My question is why it need to be configured on both sides. If I configure it
only on sw1, will it still work?

PD

• Next message: Dalu-Chandu, Jay: "RE: FRF.16 (Multilink Frame-Relay)"
• Previous message: C&S Groupstudy: "RE: FRF.16 (Multilink Frame-Relay)"
• Maybe in reply to: Peter Ding: "Cisco R/S Practice Lab6 (Pg. 371): port-priority"
• Next in thread: mani poopal: "RE: Cisco R/S Practice Lab6 (Pg. 371): port-priority"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:46 GMT-3