From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Fri Sep 17 2004 - 09:01:51 GMT-3
Thanks Wei,
My copy/paste was wrong. I mean: without the command "ip policy route-map
VoIP_PBR" under loopback, does it work? (just with the global command "ip
local policy route-map VoIP_PBR". Or with just the command under loopback
and without the global command.
I did not understand if and why it need both?
Cordially,
------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaerte Gladston Vidali
IBM Global Services - SO
Tel.55+11+2121-2879 Fax:55+11+2121-2449
"Wei Zhu" <zhuwei1231@yahoo.ca>
16/09/2004 20:39
Please respond to
"Wei Zhu"
To
Alaerte Gladston Vidali/Brazil/IBM@IBMBR, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc
Subject
Re: RE: policy routing local generated voice traffic? problem solved!
It doesn't work.
As voice data is generated from Lo0, use the policy route on Lo0 works.
Not sure why the DOC requires ip cef, it worked without, maybe just for
fast
switching of voice data.
Thanks
Wei
----- Original Message -----
From: <gladston@br.ibm.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: RE: policy routing local generated voice traffic? problem
solved!
> Hi Wei,
>
> If you just use "ip route-cache policy" under the loopback0, does it
work?
> (without "ip local policy route-map")
>
> ====================
> interface loopback0
> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
> ip policy route-map VoIP_PBR
> ip route-cache policy
> !
> ip local policy route-map VoIP_PBR
> ====================
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:45 GMT-3