From: W Walla (wallafly@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 17 2004 - 02:07:58 GMT-3
Oh, well what I was meaning was that this is in between the new T1 link, a
full T1 now..
>From: James <james@towardex.com>
>To: W Walla <wallafly@hotmail.com>
>CC: dmadlan@interprise.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: T1 Timeslot Frame-relay question
>Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:56:14 -0400
>
>On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:25:03AM +0000, W Walla wrote:
> > Thanks Guys!
> >
> > I enabled fair queing and it seems to help. What is your opinion of
>these
> > extended ping results, over the new T1:
>
>Looks fine other than high latency, but that also looks normal since
>you increased the datagram size, hence increasing serialization delay.
>
>There is only so much a 256kbps pipe can carry :P
>
>-J
>
>--
>James Jun TowardEX Technologies,
>Inc.
>Technical Lead Network Design, Consulting, IT
>Outsourcing
>james@towardex.com Boston-based Colocation & Bandwidth
>Services
>cell: 1(978)-394-2867 web: http://www.towardex.com , noc:
>www.twdx.net
>
> > Protocol [ip]:
> > Target IP address: 192.168.250.3
> > Repeat count [5]: 200
> > Datagram size [100]: 1500
> > Timeout in seconds [2]:
> > Extended commands [n]: y
> > Source address or interface: 192.168.0.250
> > Type of service [0]:
> > Set DF bit in IP header? [no]:
> > Validate reply data? [no]:
> > Data pattern [0xABCD]:
> > Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
> > Sweep range of sizes [n]:
> > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > Sending 200, 1500-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.250.3, timeout is 2
>seconds:
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > Success rate is 100 percent (200/200), round-trip min/avg/max = 56/57/60
>ms
> >
> > >From: MADMAN <dmadlan@interprise.com>
> > >To: James <james@towardex.com>
> > >CC: W Walla <wallafly@hotmail.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: Re: T1 Timeslot Frame-relay question
> > >Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:03:13 -0500
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >James wrote:
> > >
> > >>On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 03:52:23PM +0000, W Walla wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>/Hello good people-
> > >>>
> > >>>I have a question on how this hub and spoke is configured. I have a
> > >>>full T1 on both side but the HUB shows timeslots 1-24 and the spoke
>side
> > >>>doesn't have that sommand. How is this affecting performance, what
> > >>>should be done to take advantage of the Full T1 between the two.
>Also,
> > >>>the HUB has other spokes it shares with the "spoke" in question they
>are
> > >>>all 256k with timeslots 1-4 command.. Thanks!
> > >
> > > The side the "doesn't have that command" is not fractional capable
>most
> > >likely.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>By default, timeslots are 1-24.
> > >>
> > >>The timeslots shouldn't be determined by you in general per se, it
> > >>should be determined by what type of contract you purchase from the
> > >>telco w/ respect to a particular circuit.
> > >>
> > >>If you are buying a fractional 384k frame circuit at one location,
> > >>then it would be 1-6 for the timeslot. The hub site would remain
> > >>at 1-24, assuming the hub site's circuit ID in telco's database
> > >>says it is a full T1, and assuming the hub site's circuit is really
> > >>full T1.
> > >>
> > >>-J
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>James Jun TowardEX
> > >>Technologies, Inc.
> > >>Technical Lead Network Design, Consulting, IT
> > >>Outsourcing
> > >>james@towardex.com Boston-based Colocation &
>Bandwidth
> > >>Services
> > >>cell: 1(978)-394-2867 web: http://www.towardex.com , noc:
> > >>www.twdx.net
> > >>
> >
> >>_______________________________________________________________________
> > >>Subscription information may be found at:
> > >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >
> > >--
> > >David Madland
> > >CCIE# 2016
> > >Sr. Network Engineer
> > >Qwest Communications
> > >612-664-3367
> > >
> > >"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools
>and
> > more! http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:45 GMT-3