Re: RE: policy routing local generated voice traffic? problem

From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Thu Sep 16 2004 - 14:30:08 GMT-3

• Next message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Permit udp any range 16384 32767 any"
• Previous message: Anthony Pace: "OT: Black holes and BGP"
• Maybe in reply to: wei zhu: "RE: policy routing local generated voice traffic? problem"
• Next in thread: Wei Zhu: "Re: RE: policy routing local generated voice traffic? problem"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Wei,

If you just use "ip route-cache policy" under the loopback0, does it work?
(without "ip local policy route-map")

====================
interface loopback0
 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
 ip policy route-map VoIP_PBR
 ip route-cache policy
!
ip local policy route-map VoIP_PBR
====================

• Next message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Permit udp any range 16384 32767 any"
• Previous message: Anthony Pace: "OT: Black holes and BGP"
• Maybe in reply to: wei zhu: "RE: policy routing local generated voice traffic? problem"
• Next in thread: Wei Zhu: "Re: RE: policy routing local generated voice traffic? problem"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:45 GMT-3