Re: Re: Setting Frame-Relay DE to 1

From: Andy Mrozek (andymrozek@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Sep 10 2004 - 17:25:58 GMT-3


Best explanation so far Gladstone thanks.... As you
picked up on I was looking for various ways that it is
possible to set DE for whatever reason ,weather or not
it is considered best practice wasnt of a concern ,
just looking for methods to set DE what IOS features
are available to tag desired traffic with DE if the
requirement ever came about . So exactly what you
stated that MQC with 12.2T could be used as well as
FRTS... Thanks a bunch
--- gladston@br.ibm.com wrote:

> =========
> quoted
> Is it required to use FRTS...?
> =========
>
> I don't think it is necessary. In fact, they are two
> different functions (that correlates)
>
> You can use the new feature 12.2T to mark DE within
> a police-map
> Or you can use the old method, de-list.
>
> I never tested it but I would say that it works
> independently of the FRTS function.
> As others posted, FRTS will take care of avoiding
> oversubscription of CIR, which would avoid frames to
> be discarded.
> On the other hand, I do not see a reason to set DE
> if you are using FRTS with parameters (CIR, minCIR,
> adaptive-shaping) appropriate to your contract
> because if your router detects congestion (BECN) it
> will drop the transmission rate to avoid discarding
> frame.
> If you are not using FRTS, maybe you will transmit
> over your contracted CIR all the time, and
> eventually there will be congestion on the Frame
> Relay networks causing your frames be discarded. In
> this case it would be wise to choose what frames
> will be discarded first, setting the DE.
> Remember that after discarding DE frames, other
> frames will be discarded if the congestion is
> occurring.
>
> What you thing?
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:41 GMT-3