Re: ACL question

From: Phil (theccie@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 06 2004 - 12:59:39 GMT-3


Jonathan,

That's how the access-list behaves in the command
"neighbor x.x.x.x distribute-list 101 out" under router bgp.

Check this document:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk80/technologies_tech_note09186a00801310cb.shtml

Phil

On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 09:34:33 -0500, Jonathan R. Charles
<jrcdehc@ameritech.net> wrote:
> In BGP Case Studies, the following paragraph
>
> The command "access-list 1 permit 160.0.0.0 0.255.255.255" permits
> 160.0.0.0/8, 160.0.0.0/9, 160.0.0.0/10 and so on. In order to restrict the
> update to only 160.0.0.0/8, we have to use an extended access-list of the
> following format: "access-list 101 permit ip 160.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
> 255.0.0.0 0.0.0.0" This list permits 160.0.0.0/8 only.
>
> I must be missing something here, because I don't see how the destination of
> 255.0.0.0 with a mask of 0.0.0.0 would permit all the other 160.0.0.0
> networks that had a mask different from 8.
>
> Jonathan Charles
>
> SBC
>
> CCNP/CCDP, NNCSE, NNCSS, MCSE
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:37 GMT-3