From: marc van hoof (mvh@marcvanhoof.com)
Date: Fri Sep 03 2004 - 03:49:31 GMT-3
Quick - someone report lab 36 to the FBI for failing to co-operate with
the student's needs...
:P
sorry - that's the last time i'll mention it - just couldn't resist :D
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Brian Dennis
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 4:35 PM
To: Tasuka Amano Hsu; ccielab Groupstudy
Subject: RE: Frame de bit without fragment
Tasuka,
Are you sure that you are not referring to IPexpert? We
(Internetwork Expert) do not have a lab 36 like the one you mentioned.
IPexpert (http://www.ipexpert.com) and Internetwork Expert
(http://www.internetworkexpert.com) are two totally different companies.
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tasuka Amano Hsu
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 7:32 PM
To: ccielab Groupstudy
Subject: Frame de bit without fragment
Hi,
Here is the require from IEWB lab 36:
From R2 any non-initial fragmented ICMP packets going out to VLAN7 will
have discard eligibility bit set on it. Do NOT use "fragments" keyword
with frame-relay de-group command.
If R4 detects PVC states other than invalid, active or inactive it will
inform 136.10.40.100.
After I read the solution download from IE, they still use fragments
after the frame-relay de-group, and not found any infom to
136.10.40.100 configuration.
So does this require impossible ?
Sincerely,
Tasuka
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:35 GMT-3