Re: Re: ISIS L1 and L2 route

From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Tue Aug 31 2004 - 16:48:39 GMT-3


It is the normal behavior.

====================================
R2
i L1 150.50.200.0/24 [115/10] via 150.50.17.1, Ethernet1/0
i L2 150.50.18.0/24 [115/10] via 150.50.17.1, Ethernet1/0
====================================

Although you are redistributing 150.50.200.0
===================
r1
i L1 150.50.200.0/24 [115/10] via 150.50.17.1, Ethernet1/0
C 150.50.17.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet1/0
i L2 150.50.18.0/24 [115/10] via 150.50.17.1, Ethernet1/0
===================

You used the command passive interface for this same route
==================
router isis
 passive-interface Ethernet0/0
==================

So the route under ethernet 0/0 is L1 while the redistributed route (150.50.18.0) is L2.

Makes sense?

Try to remove the command "passive-interface Ethernet0/0" and see what is the result.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:51 GMT-3