From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Aug 17 2004 - 20:55:51 GMT-3
Larry,
I personally suspect that far too many candidates ask far too few questions
of the proctors.
As you probably know, the proctors are there to help clarify instructions.
By definition, if something can be intepreted in more than one way, the
proctor is there to remove ambiguity.
So, then the issue becomes can you articulate the multiple ways something
can be intepreted? If you can, you have a legit question for the proctor.
And, by taking the mental energy to consider the different ways to interpret
the task, you'll probably discover on occasion, that, in fact, because of
other info elsewhere in the lab booklet, the task can only be done in a
particular way or either way is OK.
But, I think the process is important. By thinking of how the question can
be interpreted, you'll probably gain insight into what really needs to be
done.
But, don't be hesitent to ask the proctor. In your previous example, I'm
sure the proctor would give you useful info.
HTH, Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Metzger" <larrymetzger@sbcglobal.net>
To: "'Group Study'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:58 PM
Subject: RE: Time Range
> I've completed several practice labs and have found at least a dozen
> places on each that I want to ask the writer questions. I guess I'll
> practice mentally saying, if this then that and plan on asking the
> proctor when the time comes.
>
> Thanks.
> Larry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph D. Phillips [mailto:josephdphillips@fastmail.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:50 PM
> To: Larry Metzger; Group Study
> Subject: Re: Time Range
>
> That's a perfect example of a question to ask the proctor. If you
> weren't
> supposed to use a time-range, the proctor would tell you the precise
> meaning
> of the syntax.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry Metzger" <larrymetzger@sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 15:35
> Subject: Time Range
>
>
> > I'm configuring a time range for an acl and have had two views on how
> > the time works. The start time is simple enough, however the end time
> > is a little odd. Even Cisco contradicts itself.
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/
> > ffun_r/ffrprt3/frf012.htm#wp1026083
> >
> > If we want to go from 8 am to 6 pm. It should be 08:00 to 17:59 (this
> > would get everything until 18:00, if we use 18:00 it will get
> everything
> > until 18:00:59). Just checking what the final answer should be on the
> > exam. Everyone seems to flip flop on this. However, they do agree
> that
> > 23:59 goes till midnight.
> >
> > Anyone have a final answer???
> >
> > Larry
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:45 GMT-3