From: Edwards, Andrew M (andrew.m.edwards@boeing.com)
Date: Tue Aug 17 2004 - 21:17:03 GMT-3
I asked the proctor many questions. His response was always the same
and it made sense... "Did the lab book ask you to do xxxxxxx? If it
did, then do it." 8)
IOW, RTQ/ATQ
HTH,
andy
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:56 PM
To: Larry Metzger; 'Group Study'
Subject: Re: Time Range
Larry,
I personally suspect that far too many candidates ask far too few
questions of the proctors.
As you probably know, the proctors are there to help clarify
instructions. By definition, if something can be intepreted in more than
one way, the proctor is there to remove ambiguity.
So, then the issue becomes can you articulate the multiple ways
something can be intepreted? If you can, you have a legit question for
the proctor.
And, by taking the mental energy to consider the different ways to
interpret the task, you'll probably discover on occasion, that, in fact,
because of other info elsewhere in the lab booklet, the task can only be
done in a particular way or either way is OK.
But, I think the process is important. By thinking of how the question
can be interpreted, you'll probably gain insight into what really needs
to be done.
But, don't be hesitent to ask the proctor. In your previous example,
I'm sure the proctor would give you useful info.
HTH, Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Metzger" <larrymetzger@sbcglobal.net>
To: "'Group Study'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:58 PM
Subject: RE: Time Range
> I've completed several practice labs and have found at least a dozen
> places on each that I want to ask the writer questions. I guess I'll
> practice mentally saying, if this then that and plan on asking the
> proctor when the time comes.
>
> Thanks.
> Larry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph D. Phillips [mailto:josephdphillips@fastmail.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:50 PM
> To: Larry Metzger; Group Study
> Subject: Re: Time Range
>
> That's a perfect example of a question to ask the proctor. If you
> weren't supposed to use a time-range, the proctor would tell you the
> precise meaning
> of the syntax.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry Metzger" <larrymetzger@sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 15:35
> Subject: Time Range
>
>
> > I'm configuring a time range for an acl and have had two views on
> > how the time works. The start time is simple enough, however the
> > end time is a little odd. Even Cisco contradicts itself.
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgc
> r/
> > ffun_r/ffrprt3/frf012.htm#wp1026083
> >
> > If we want to go from 8 am to 6 pm. It should be 08:00 to 17:59
> > (this would get everything until 18:00, if we use 18:00 it will get
> everything
> > until 18:00:59). Just checking what the final answer should be on
> > the exam. Everyone seems to flip flop on this. However, they do
> > agree
> that
> > 23:59 goes till midnight.
> >
> > Anyone have a final answer???
> >
> > Larry
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:45 GMT-3