From: Bhavin Patel (BPatel@ibasis.net)
Date: Tue Aug 17 2004 - 12:04:54 GMT-3
Hi all,
I was doing Lab 22 of Solie Vol1 (Pg. 715) and noticed one issue. On Pg.
725, it is mentioned that without adding the "ip summary-address ...."
statements to s0.2 of Wisconsin router, Stillwater wont have route to
172.16.5.0/25 & 192.168.1.0/24. However, I noticed that even without adding
this statement, Stillwater had router to 192.168.1.0/24.
Below are some configs of Minnesota & Stillwater router.
Has the default behavior changed or is this IOS related?
R3-minnesota:
---------------
router eigrp 65001
redistribute rip
network 192.168.2.0
default-metric 1544 100 254 1 1500
no auto-summary
!
router rip
redistribute eigrp 65001
network 172.16.0.0
default-metric 4
!
R3-minnesota#sh ip ro
Gateway of last resort is not set
172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
D 172.16.5.0/25 [90/2172416] via 192.168.2.1, 11:53:47, Serial0/0.1
D 172.16.6.0/24 [90/21049600] via 192.168.2.1, 11:49:01, Serial0/0.1
C 172.16.2.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet2/0
D 172.16.3.0/24 [90/21026560] via 192.168.2.1, 11:53:47, Serial0/0.1
192.168.1.0/29 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 192.168.1.0 [90/21024000] via 192.168.2.1, 11:53:47, Serial0/0.1
C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0.1
R3-minnesota#
R1-stillwater:
--------------
router rip
network 172.16.0.0
R1-stillwater#sh ip ro
Gateway of last resort is not set
172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets
R 172.16.6.0 [120/4] via 172.16.2.1, 00:00:17, FastEthernet0/0
C 172.16.2.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
R 172.16.3.0 [120/4] via 172.16.2.1, 00:00:17, FastEthernet0/0
R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/4] via 172.16.2.1, 00:00:17, FastEthernet0/0
R 192.168.2.0/24 [120/4] via 172.16.2.1, 00:00:17, FastEthernet0/0
Thanks,
Bhavin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:44 GMT-3