From: Kian Wah, Lai (kian_wah@qala.com.sg)
Date: Tue Aug 10 2004 - 09:10:59 GMT-3
Oops, left out 'version 2'
-----Original Message-----
From: tycampbell@comcast.net [mailto:tycampbell@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:08 PM
To: Kian Wah, Lai; 'marc van hoof'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Loopback into RIP
why are you running no auto-summary under RIP v1 ?
just curious :-)
> For example,
>
> Int loopback 0
> Ip add 150.1.1.1
>
> Int s0/0
> Ip add 140.1.1.1
>
> Router rip
> No auto-summary
> Network 150.1.0.0
> Network 140.1.0.0
>
> The router that receives the update will have the loopback address.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
marc
> van hoof
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 7:21 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Loopback into RIP
>
> Is there a way other than redistributing connected to dynamically
advertise
> loopback interface addresses into RIP ?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> -marc.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:36 GMT-3