From: john matijevic (matijevi@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sun Aug 08 2004 - 10:54:24 GMT-3
Hello Kaloyan,
What you are seeing is normal behavior with IS-IS, basically it treats
each level-1 router as a stub area. It will send a default route to a
level-1 area. IF you have a level-1-2 domain you can configure route
leaking so that the individual routes will show up with the default. For
more information on that see the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk381/technologies_tech_note09186a
0080093f39.shtml
:)
Sincerely,
John Matijevic, CCIE #13254, MCSE, CNE, CCEA
Network Consultant
Hablo Espanol
305-321-6232
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
k_kaloianov@eircom.net
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 7:06 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: isis and ATT bit=1
Hi Group,
just a dumb question about isis and IOS ver 12.2, I'm just having two
areas and one router in one area and two in the other one, the two
routers are L1 and L1/L2 and the other one is L2 or L2/L1, I just want
to know whether we have to use clns router isis command on L2/L1
iterface connecting /w L1 router or alternatively default-information
originate and default static route to null interface in order to
propagate default route to L1 router? The behaviour that I saw was that
even without any of the above configuration there was a default route
created in L1 routing table? Thanks in advance:)
Reg,
Kaloyan-:)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:35 GMT-3