isis and ATT bit=1

From: k_kaloianov@eircom.net
Date: Sun Aug 08 2004 - 08:06:03 GMT-3

• Next message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: ISDN BRI commands on Serial Interfaces"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "Re: ip pim rp-accept <rp-address> [acl#] command"
• Next in thread: john matijevic: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: john matijevic: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: john matijevic: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: k_kaloianov@eircom.net: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: k_kaloianov@eircom.net: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: TiuN Hong Leng: "Re: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Peter van Oene: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Peter van Oene: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Group,

just a dumb question about isis and IOS ver 12.2, I'm just having two areas and one router in one area and two in the other one, the two routers are L1 and L1/L2 and the other one is L2 or L2/L1, I just want to know whether we have to use clns router isis command on L2/L1 iterface connecting /w L1 router or alternatively default-information originate and default static route to null interface in order to propagate default route to L1 router? The behaviour that I saw was that even without any of the above configuration there was a default route created in L1 routing table? Thanks in advance:)

Reg,

Kaloyan-:)

• Next message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: ISDN BRI commands on Serial Interfaces"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "Re: ip pim rp-accept <rp-address> [acl#] command"
• Next in thread: john matijevic: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: john matijevic: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: john matijevic: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: k_kaloianov@eircom.net: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: k_kaloianov@eircom.net: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: TiuN Hong Leng: "Re: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Peter van Oene: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Maybe reply: Peter van Oene: "RE: isis and ATT bit=1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:35 GMT-3