Re: no arp frame-relay

From: tycampbell@comcast.net
Date: Mon Aug 02 2004 - 12:55:10 GMT-3

• Next message: Mohamed: "RE: Multicast doubt"
• Previous message: Richard Gallagher: "Re: Multicast doubt"
• Maybe in reply to: James Yeo: "no arp frame-relay"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

"no arp frame-relay" is not necessary

> Hi group,
>
> Is it necessary to use "no arp frame-relay" if you have already configured "no
> frame-relay inverse-arp" if you are asked not rely on arp for addresses etc?
>
> Thanks
>
> James
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Mohamed: "RE: Multicast doubt"
• Previous message: Richard Gallagher: "Re: Multicast doubt"
• Maybe in reply to: James Yeo: "no arp frame-relay"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:31 GMT-3