From: Bob Sinclair (bsin@cox.net)
Date: Mon Jul 26 2004 - 23:01:42 GMT-3
Ken,
Here is a link to a fairly technical discussion comparing the two. Perhaps
the key phrase is this-
quote
CAR works well together with IP multicast
traffic and does also allow to better restrict bursty traffic by mean
of committed-rate, burst-rate and burst-size parameters. What CAR
can not do is that it does not allow to have per mroute-state rate
limiters to be established dynamically.
end quote
[which ip mulitcast rate-limit does (?)]
The link-
ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/ipmulticast/config-notes/multicast-rate-limit.txt
HTH,
Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CISSP, MCSE
www.netmasterclass.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Wygand" <KWygand@customonline.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:24 PM
Subject: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit"
> Group,
>
> In order to cap multicast traffic off to a certain level, what's the
difference between using the "rate-limit" command vs. the "ip multicast
rate-limit" command (other than the different attributes that can be
applied). This is really both a lab preparation question as well as a
real-world question.
>
> Thanks!
> Ken
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:04 GMT-3