"rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit"

From: Kenneth Wygand (KWygand@customonline.com)
Date: Mon Jul 26 2004 - 22:24:39 GMT-3

• Next message: ccie2be: "Re: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Previous message: Brian Dennis: "RE: keepalive on BRI"
• Next in thread: ccie2be: "Re: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: Dan Shechter: "Re: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: Yasser Aly: "RE: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Group,
 
In order to cap multicast traffic off to a certain level, what's the difference between using the "rate-limit" command vs. the "ip multicast rate-limit" command (other than the different attributes that can be applied). This is really both a lab preparation question as well as a real-world question.
 
Thanks!
Ken

• Next message: ccie2be: "Re: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Previous message: Brian Dennis: "RE: keepalive on BRI"
• Next in thread: ccie2be: "Re: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: Dan Shechter: "Re: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: Yasser Aly: "RE: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Maybe reply: Kenneth Wygand: "RE: "rate-limit" vs. "ip multicast rate-limit""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:04 GMT-3