police vs. shape peak

From: John Matus (jmatus@pacbell.net)
Date: Thu Jul 22 2004 - 18:59:27 GMT-3

• Next message: Joseph D. Phillips: "Re: police vs. shape peak"
• Previous message: jongsoo.kim@intelsat.com: "IP NAT Question"
• Next in thread: Joseph D. Phillips: "Re: police vs. shape peak"
• Maybe reply: Joseph D. Phillips: "Re: police vs. shape peak"
• Maybe reply: Felice Russell: "RE: police vs. shape peak"
• Maybe reply: Baety Wayne A 30 SIG BN RS3 (cn): "RE: police vs. shape peak"
• Maybe reply: John Matus: "Re: police vs. shape peak"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: police vs. shape peak"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

if you have a limit on the amount of traffic that you can send.....or, the
traffice must "conform" to a certain rate.......would you use

policy-map null
  class class-default
  police 250000

or

policy-map null
  class class-defualt
  shape peak 250000

what would be the difference??

Regards,

John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
818.782.2061 office
818.430.8372 mobile
jmatus@pacbell.net

• Next message: Joseph D. Phillips: "Re: police vs. shape peak"
• Previous message: jongsoo.kim@intelsat.com: "IP NAT Question"
• Next in thread: Joseph D. Phillips: "Re: police vs. shape peak"
• Maybe reply: Joseph D. Phillips: "Re: police vs. shape peak"
• Maybe reply: Felice Russell: "RE: police vs. shape peak"
• Maybe reply: Baety Wayne A 30 SIG BN RS3 (cn): "RE: police vs. shape peak"
• Maybe reply: John Matus: "Re: police vs. shape peak"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: police vs. shape peak"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:01 GMT-3