From: john matijevic (matijevi@bellsouth.net)
Date: Wed Jul 21 2004 - 13:25:29 GMT-3
Hello,
You have a maximum of 255, than 127 would still be less than the
maximum, if you go to 128 than you go to 256 than you are over maximum.
I have seen it done both ways in practice labs. I would tend to use 127.
It's probably good idea to clarify with the proctor, if you can.
Sincerely,
John Matijevic, CCIE #13254, MCSE, CNE, CCEA
Network Consultant
Hablo Espanol
305-321-6232
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Nawaz, Ajaz
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:16 PM
To: 'Lord, Chris'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Dialer Threshold Values
rounding up 127.5 to the nearest whole number is indeed 128 as you
stated.
if you're presented with entering a value from 0-255 than you have 256
right
?,
and so in this case it's definately 128 imho.
hth
ajaz
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Lord, Chris
Sent: 21 July 2004 17:00
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Dialer Threshold Values
I know this is a small point, but can anyone confirm for me how the
proctors
expect the dialer load-threshold values to be rounded? If you are told,
for
example, to bring-up the second bri channel at 50% load then
mathematically
this is 255/2 = 127.5. Should this be configured as 127 or 128? I think
it
should be 127 because technically if it were 128, the load would have to
reach 50.2% before the line would come up. So I would always round-down
to
the next lowest number whatever the % yields.
????
Thanks,
Chris.
**********************************************************************
The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended
for
the recipient only. If you have received it in error, please notify us
immediately by reply email and then delete it from your system. Please
do
not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any
other person or store or copy this information in any medium. The views
contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily
those of
Lorien plc.
Thank you for your co-operation.
**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:00 GMT-3