From: Scott Savage (rolande23@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Sun Jul 18 2004 - 16:46:21 GMT-3
No time to test right now... But, if you aren't
allowed to redistribute the loopback into any IGP,
then I am thinking NAT is the way to go. I would set
the loopback for NAT inside and set all 5 interfaces
for NAT outside and setup a NAT translation rule to
hide behind a local IP address that is reachable from
everywhere on the network.
Scott
--- ccie2be <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Here's an interesting challenge for all those ccie
> wannabe's out there:
>
>
> There's a router in the middle of your network with
> 5 active interfaces. It's
> running a couple of different routing protocols:
> eigrp and ospf.
>
> On this router a loopback interface, lo133, is
> configured with the address
> 154.6.133.1/24 which is not known or advertised by
> any routing protocol.
>
> On this same router, the command, ip telnet
> source-interface lo133, is
> configured.
>
> What additional configuration is needed so that
> telnet sessions initiated from
> this router are successful to any other router in
> the network?
>
> Prove your config by showing multiple successful
> telnets.
=====
-- Scott Savage
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:58 GMT-3