Re: Quiz Question of the Day 20040712

From: Daniel Sheedy (dansheedy@gmx.net)
Date: Tue Jul 13 2004 - 10:20:54 GMT-3


Hi Kenneth,

Yes, I labbed up both sides and was recieving routes.

Dan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Wygand" <KWygand@customonline.com>
To: "Daniel Sheedy" <dansheedy@gmx.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 2:19 PM
Subject: RE: Quiz Question of the Day 20040712

Hey everyone, and thanks for attempting this quiz!

Let's use Daniel's case as an example because he posted the output I was
looking for.

OK, So from the "debug ip rip", rip is sending v2 updates out 11.0.0.x and
not 10.0.0.x. This satisfies the original requirement that updates must
pass the 11.0.0.x network but not the 10.0.0.x network.

Daniel - did you set up the other side? Did you "debug ip rip" over there?
Did you receive routes on the other side? If not, or if you don't have
"another side" to lab up, why don't you try a "debug ip packet". It might
not look like you think it will. ;-)

Any other suggestions? Anyone?

Ken

________________________________

From: Daniel Sheedy [mailto:dansheedy@gmx.net]
Sent: Tue 7/13/2004 1:48 AM
To: Kenneth Wygand
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Quiz Question of the Day 20040712

G'day Kenneth

I labbed it just then and could get it working with just using secondary
ips.
I thought maybe i would have to use a 'no validate-update-source', but it
worked without that as well.

Under the interface I had a secondary ip address with the 11 ip address.
Under rip i had a net statement for 11.0.0.0.
And I had a neighbor statement for the other 11 ip address, although it
worked with or without the neighbor statement.

Here is my debug ip rip:

RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Serial0 (11.1.1.3) - suppressing
null update
RIP: sending v2 update to 11.1.1.1 via Serial0 (11.1.1.3)
     11.1.1.0/24 -> 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
RIP: Update contains 1 routes
RIP: Update queued
RIP: Update sent via Serial

So, what is the catch with this question? Am I overlooking something
blindingly obvious?
They are fairly old routers though....IOS version 10.3 and 11.0

Dan Sheedy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Wygand" <KWygand@customonline.com>
To: <andrew.m.edwards@boeing.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: Quiz Question of the Day 20040712

> Andy,
>
> If you can, try labbing this up and "debug ip rip".
>
> Ken
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edwards, Andrew M <andrew.m.edwards@boeing.com>
> To: Kenneth Wygand <KWygand@customonline.com>
> Sent: Mon Jul 12 12:45:15 2004
> Subject: RE: Quiz Question of the Day 20040712
>
> How about...
>
> R1:
>
> Int <link ID>
> Ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> Ip address 11.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
>
> Router rip
> No auto
> Version 2
> Passive default
> No passive <link ID>
> Neighbor 11.0.0.2
> Network 11.0.0.0
>
>
> R2:
>
> Int <link ID>
> Ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
> Ip address 11.0.0.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
>
> Router rip
> No auto
> Version 2
> Passive default
> No pass <link ID>
> Neighbor 11.0.0.1
> Network 11.0.0.0
>
>
>
> andy
>
> ----- Original message -----
> From: "Kenneth Wygand" <KWygand@customonline.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:04:20 -0400
> Subject: Quiz Question of the Day 20040712
>
> ?
> Here's your Monday Morning brain cruncher!
>
> R1----10.0.0.x/24----R2
>
> Link on R1 connecting to R2 is 10.0.0.1/24
> Link on R2 connecting to R1 is 10.0.0.2/24
>
> R2 has RIPv2 routes that it is receiving from an external source. You do
> not have any information about what networks or subnets R2 is receiving.
>
> R1 needs to receive these routes from R2.
>
> RIP updates are NOT allowed to be sourced from any address in the
> 10.0.0.0/24 range.
>
> RIP routes may only be sourced form the 11.0.0.0/24 network, which is
> not currently defined anywhere.
>
> You CANNOT change the primary IP address on the interfaces between R1
> and R2.
>
> Your configuration CANNOT include the following:
>
> R1:
> interface tunnel(x)
> ip address 11.0.0.(x) 255.255.255.0
> tunnel source 10.0.0.1
> tunnel destination 10.0.0.2
>
> How can this be accomplished?
>
> Good Luck!! :)
>
> Ken
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com <http://shop.groupstudy.com/>
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com <http://shop.groupstudy.com/>
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:54 GMT-3