From: Joseph D. Phillips (josephdphillips@fastmail.us)
Date: Mon Jul 12 2004 - 12:15:24 GMT-3
Would you not assign secondary addressing on the two interfaces?
It's either that or run static NAT on them.
----- Original message -----
From: "Kenneth Wygand" <KWygand@customonline.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:04:20 -0400
Subject: Quiz Question of the Day 20040712
?
Here's your Monday Morning brain cruncher!
R1----10.0.0.x/24----R2
Link on R1 connecting to R2 is 10.0.0.1/24
Link on R2 connecting to R1 is 10.0.0.2/24
R2 has RIPv2 routes that it is receiving from an external source.
You do not have any information about what networks or subnets R2 is
receiving.
R1 needs to receive these routes from R2.
RIP updates are NOT allowed to be sourced from any address in the
10.0.0.0/24 range.
RIP routes may only be sourced form the 11.0.0.0/24 network, which is
not currently defined anywhere.
You CANNOT change the primary IP address on the interfaces between R1
and R2.
Your configuration CANNOT include the following:
R1:
interface tunnel(x)
ip address 11.0.0.(x) 255.255.255.0
tunnel source 10.0.0.1
tunnel destination 10.0.0.2
How can this be accomplished?
Good Luck!! :)
Ken
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:52 GMT-3