From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Thu Jul 08 2004 - 18:59:28 GMT-3
Ty,
You could also use a prefix-list if an access-list isn't
permitted to apply to a distribute-list ;-)
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ty
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 2:40 PM
To: Scott Morris; Brian McGahan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: recursive routing
yes, distance did it...I just put it on the wrong router...DOH!!!!
Thanks y'all :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
To: "'Brian McGahan'" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>;
<tycampbell@comcast.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: recursive routing
> That would be very true, except for the fact that I'm aware of the lab
that
> he's working on, and ACLs aren't allowed.
>
> So, the problem is intended to appear to highlight the problem, and
the
> intended solution would be to work around it.
>
> Sooo... Yup, very good point that once you recognize it, you should
make
it
> go away ahead of time. But every once and a while you aren't allowed
to
do
> the "normal" things to make that so simple.
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
CISSP,
> JNCIP, et al.
> IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
> http://www.ipexpert.net
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McGahan [mailto:bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 2:33 PM
> To: Scott Morris; tycampbell@comcast.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: recursive routing
>
> Scott,
>
> If you want to recognize the problem, then alleviate it, why would
> you even advertise the tunnel destination into the protocol running
over
the
> tunnel? :) There is never a valid case where the tunnel destination
can
be
> routed via the tunnel, so why go out of the way to fix a problem that
> shouldn't exist in the first place?
>
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Scott Morris
> > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 1:15 PM
> > To: tycampbell@comcast.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: recursive routing
> >
> > Think distance man! :)
> >
> > The problem with recursive routing (on a tunnel interface) is when
the
> > router decides it wants to get to the other side of the tunnel
> > (tunnel-destination ip) through the tunnel itself. It brings about
> one of
> > those philosophical quandaries in life.
> >
> > So think like the router does. Routing is just fine before the
tunnel
> > comes up, learning through RIP, right? After the tunnel comes up,
the
> router
> > learns the same route through OSPF. OSPF is preferred. Why? AD.
> >
> > So... Recognize the problem, then alleviate it! Make the router do
> what
> > you want. :)
> >
> > Change the distance for that route (either in OSPF or in RIP,
> depending on
> > your lab requirements) and life will be better. The same decision
> factor
> > for that route should bring the same result both before and after
the
> > tunnel is created.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> CISSP,
> > JNCIP, et al.
> > IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> > IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
> > http://www.ipexpert.net
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > tycampbell@comcast.net
> > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 1:56 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: recursive routing
> >
> > I have searched the doc cd...over and over..even searched on google.
> >
> > I am looking for a way to fix recursive routing through a tunnel
> without
> > using static routes..
> >
> >
> > anyone have any ideas ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks!!!
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:50 GMT-3