From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jul 06 2004 - 20:43:46 GMT-3
Nope, not the answer.
Variance is already configured and unequal load balancing already works
between R2 and R3.
The problem is that while unequal load balancing works between R2 & R3,
unequal load balancing *doesn't* work between
R1 and R3.
Why?
And, what is the solution?
----- Original Message -----
From: <tycampbell@comcast.net>
To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: Eigrp unequal load balancing problem
> I think variance may be the answer you are looking for
>
> variance of 2 should do it for this scenario
>
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Here's the scenario:
> >
> >
> > 2 mbps
> > R1 -----64k ----- R2 ========= R3
> > 1 mbps
> >
> >
> > All routers are running Eigrp. R2 and R3 have unequal load balancing
> > configured.
> >
> > Traffic between R2's lo0 and R3's lo0 unequal load balances perfectly.
> > However, traffic between R1's lo0 and R3's lo0 don't
> > unequal load balance. In this case, traffic is balanced equally across
the 2
> > links between R2 and R3.
> >
> > What the best way to have twice as much traffic going over the 2 mbps
link
> > from R3 to R2 as the 1 mbps link between those 2 routers?
> >
> >
> > TIA, Tim
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:48 GMT-3