From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jul 06 2004 - 21:33:41 GMT-3
OK, guys. You're not getting it, so I'll give you a hint.
The problem is that from R3's point of view, the 2 paths to R1 are equal
cost. This is because when Eigrp figures out the cost to a destination, it
using the lowest bandwidth link anywhere along the path to the destination.
Since the path to R1's lo0 includes a single 64k link between R2 and R1,
from R3's point of view both paths to R1 are equal.
That, unfortunately, is as much as I know. What I don't know is how to
overcome this problem such that R3 unequal load balances traffic to R1 just
llike it does with traffic to R2.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergio Jimenez Arguedas" <sejimenez@its.co.cr>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:14 PM
Subject: RV: Eigrp unequal load balancing problem
> Hi,
>
> I think traffic shara balanced is the option!!!
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr
> rp_r/1rfeigrp.htm#wp1024898
>
>
> Rgds,
>
>
> Sergio
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]En nombre de
> ccie2be
> Enviado el: martes, 06 de julio de 2004 17:44
> Para: tycampbell@comcast.net; Group Study
> Asunto: Re: Eigrp unequal load balancing problem
>
>
> Nope, not the answer.
>
> Variance is already configured and unequal load balancing already works
> between R2 and R3.
>
> The problem is that while unequal load balancing works between R2 & R3,
> unequal load balancing *doesn't* work between
>
> R1 and R3.
>
> Why?
>
> And, what is the solution?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <tycampbell@comcast.net>
> To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 7:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Eigrp unequal load balancing problem
>
>
> > I think variance may be the answer you are looking for
> >
> > variance of 2 should do it for this scenario
> >
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > Here's the scenario:
> > >
> > >
> > > 2 mbps
> > > R1 -----64k ----- R2 ========= R3
> > > 1 mbps
> > >
> > >
> > > All routers are running Eigrp. R2 and R3 have unequal load balancing
> > > configured.
> > >
> > > Traffic between R2's lo0 and R3's lo0 unequal load balances perfectly.
> > > However, traffic between R1's lo0 and R3's lo0 don't
> > > unequal load balance. In this case, traffic is balanced equally across
> the 2
> > > links between R2 and R3.
> > >
> > > What the best way to have twice as much traffic going over the 2 mbps
> link
> > > from R3 to R2 as the 1 mbps link between those 2 routers?
> > >
> > >
> > > TIA, Tim
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:48 GMT-3