From: Ty (tycampbell@comcast.net)
Date: Sat Jul 03 2004 - 16:34:15 GMT-3
Thanks!!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
To: "'Ty'" <tycampbell@comcast.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 2:13 PM
Subject: RE: atm question
> You shouldn't be restricted to do so. (odd if you were anyway) Any as
long
> as you aren't prohibited from doing so, unless it's required, it becomes
> completely a personal preference.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
> JNCIP, et al.
> IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
> http://www.ipexpert.net
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ty
> Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 2:56 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: atm question
>
> should you "map" an atm interface to itself so you can ping it...
> wether the requirement calls for it or not, as long as it is not
restricted
> to do so ?
>
> (same answer would be for SVC or PVC)
>
>
> ie...
>
> interface ATM0/0
>
> ip address 140.10.89.2 255.255.255.252
>
> no atm ilmi-keepalive
>
> pvc 0/101
>
> protocol ip 140.10.89.2
>
> protocol ip 140.10.89.1 broadcast
>
> oam-pvc manage 5
>
> oam retry 5 3 2
>
> encapsulation aal5snap
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:46 GMT-3