From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sat Jul 03 2004 - 16:13:27 GMT-3
You shouldn't be restricted to do so. (odd if you were anyway) Any as long
as you aren't prohibited from doing so, unless it's required, it becomes
completely a personal preference.
Cheers,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIP, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ty
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 2:56 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: atm question
should you "map" an atm interface to itself so you can ping it...
wether the requirement calls for it or not, as long as it is not restricted
to do so ?
(same answer would be for SVC or PVC)
ie...
interface ATM0/0
ip address 140.10.89.2 255.255.255.252
no atm ilmi-keepalive
pvc 0/101
protocol ip 140.10.89.2
protocol ip 140.10.89.1 broadcast
oam-pvc manage 5
oam retry 5 3 2
encapsulation aal5snap
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:46 GMT-3