From: Wayne Lawson (groupstudy@ipexpert.net)
Date: Sat Jul 03 2004 - 12:49:45 GMT-3
John / Brian / Group -
Let me clarify before this gets pointed out as a "rude email".
I simply wanted to point out that IE does have a solid support site that's
moderated frequently. We (IPexpert) also have individuals that post Q and A
here, but I've tried to point all of them to our support site for quicker
support - and to keep GS "vendor-free" in regards to support and
discussions. Hopefully this wasn't taken as a rude email - if so, (John),
I'm terribly sorry - it wasn't meant to come across as such!
Thanks - Wayne
Thanks - We Truly Appreciate Your Business!
Wayne A. Lawson II
Founder & CEO - IPexpert, Inc.
// CCIE #5244, CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, CNE
:: Toll Free: +1.866.225.8064
:: Outside U.S. & Canada: +1.312.321.6924
:: Direct eFax: +1.810.364.4838
:: Mobile: +1.810.434.4801
Mailto: wayne@IPexpert.com
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com &
"Self-Paced, Instructor Led & Distance Learning Certification
Training for the CCIE (R&S, Sec, SP and Voice Lab), CCSP, CCNP,
CCNA & Cisco Wireless Technologies"
Brian McGahan writes:
> Yes it does. Free support is provided for all of Internetwork Expert's
> products at http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
>> Wayne Lawson
>> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 9:43 PM
>> To: John Matus
>> Cc: lab
>> Subject: Re: lab 8 task 6.3-6.5 bgp installed routes
>>
>> John -
>>
>> Doesn't IE have their own support forum for stuff like this?!?....
>>
>>
>>
>> John Matus writes:
>>
>> > question regarding how bgp is going to install the prefixes from the
> bb
>> > routers...
>> >
>> > bb1--------------------r6------------------r2--------------------r3
>> > --
>> > ---
>> > ---
>> > sw2
>> >
>> > R6,R2 AND SW1 are in one AS, and sw2 and r2 are route-reflector
> clients.
>> i
>> > have also have r6 as 'next-hop-self for r2 and sw2 in order to reach
>> bb1.
>> > however only r2 has installed the prefixes in the routing table. sw
> 1
>> has the
>> > prefixes in the bgp table but they are not installed<???> is this
>> because sw2
>> > is choosing igp over bgp for the routing decisions (igp peer) where
> as
>> r2 is
>> > an ebgp peer, passing the prefixes to r3 is a different AS? i just
> want
>> to
>> > make sure that sw2 should NOT have the prefixes in the routing table
> but
>> have
>> > them in the bgp table. is this correct???????
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > John D. Matus
>> > MCSE, CCNP
>> > 818.782.2061 office
>> > 818.430.8372 mobile
>> > jmatus@pacbell.net
>> >
>> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from:
>> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
>> >
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from:
>> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:46 GMT-3