From: Wayne Lawson (groupstudy@ipexpert.net)
Date: Fri Jul 02 2004 - 23:43:17 GMT-3
John -
Doesn't IE have their own support forum for stuff like this?!?....
John Matus writes:
> question regarding how bgp is going to install the prefixes from the bb
> routers...
>
> bb1--------------------r6------------------r2--------------------r3
> --
> ---
> ---
> sw2
>
> R6,R2 AND SW1 are in one AS, and sw2 and r2 are route-reflector clients. i
> have also have r6 as 'next-hop-self for r2 and sw2 in order to reach bb1.
> however only r2 has installed the prefixes in the routing table. sw 1 has the
> prefixes in the bgp table but they are not installed<???> is this because sw2
> is choosing igp over bgp for the routing decisions (igp peer) where as r2 is
> an ebgp peer, passing the prefixes to r3 is a different AS? i just want to
> make sure that sw2 should NOT have the prefixes in the routing table but have
> them in the bgp table. is this correct???????
>
> Regards,
>
> John D. Matus
> MCSE, CCNP
> 818.782.2061 office
> 818.430.8372 mobile
> jmatus@pacbell.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:46 GMT-3