From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Sun Jun 27 2004 - 15:16:36 GMT-3
At 02:07 PM 6/27/2004, you wrote:
>Performance penalties and it is not dynamic.
or is PBR just policy based routing with a nifty cisco acronym?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joe Chang [mailto:changjoe@earthlink.net]
>Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 8:56 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: policy routing via OSPF
>
>The OSPF RFCs detail an unimplemented TOS feature. I don't think OSPF is
>the
>way to do it. On certain platforms ATM has a feature to split a flow
>into
>different VCs based on packet precedence, but I don't think that is
>available for FR.
>
>Your best bet may be PBR, but of course there are performance penalties
>with
>that approach.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:51 GMT-3