From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Sun Jun 27 2004 - 19:03:20 GMT-3
More than one topological view is not what I had in mind with PBR. But it's
a poor idea in the first place ...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter van Oene" <pvo@usermail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 2:15 PM
Subject: RE: policy routing via OSPF
> how does pbr deliver more than one topological view? ie, one physical set
> of links, and two or more sets of best paths - which would allow per
> source/dest best paths etc?
>
>
> At 02:07 PM 6/27/2004, Nir Wittenberg wrote:
> >Performance penalties and it is not dynamic.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Joe Chang [mailto:changjoe@earthlink.net]
> >Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 8:56 AM
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: policy routing via OSPF
> >
> >The OSPF RFCs detail an unimplemented TOS feature. I don't think OSPF is
> >the
> >way to do it. On certain platforms ATM has a feature to split a flow
> >into
> >different VCs based on packet precedence, but I don't think that is
> >available for FR.
> >
> >Your best bet may be PBR, but of course there are performance penalties
> >with
> >that approach.
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> >http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> >http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:51 GMT-3