From: Marvin Greenlee (marvingreenlee@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jun 27 2004 - 11:40:26 GMT-3
There are times where sections can 'break' other
sections. One example would be dial backup with
'backup interface'. The first section could state
'configure ISDN between X and Y...., X should be able
to ping Y across the ISDN..., etc. If a later section
asks for 'backup interface', that would break the
ability to ping across the link, as your BRI interface
is now in 'standby' mode.
Marvin Greenlee
Network Learning, Inc.
marvin@ccbootcamp.com
--- Richard Dumoulin <richard.dumoulin@vanco.es>
wrote:
> I don't think this is possible. All the requirements
> have to be fullfilled.
> If you break one of them to make another one work
> then you are probably
> doing something wrong,
>
> --RIchard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
> Sent: domingo, 27 de junio de 2004 0:58
> To: Group Study
> Subject: Funky Stuff - Undoing something done
> earlier in the lab
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Is this possible?
>
> Would Cisco have you config something early in the
> lab, only to have you
> UNDO part of what you've already config'd?
>
> This would seem to be quite funky because then how
> is the lab graded?
>
> For example, suppose you have to config F/R in a
> certain way to fulfill the
> requirements of an early task and you do so.
>
> Then, later in the lab, you're required to config
> OSPF in a certain way but
> in a way that forces you undo part of what you
> needed to do to fulfill the
> earlier f/r requirements. So, you undo some of what
> you've already done.
>
> But, now how is the lab graded since now your config
> for the earlier task
> isn't fulfilled?
>
> I don't know, but this doesn't seem kosher to me.
>
> What do you all think?
>
> Tim
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:51 GMT-3