From: Richard Dumoulin (richard.dumoulin@vanco.es)
Date: Wed Jun 23 2004 - 08:10:01 GMT-3
Be careful with 2. I once read from an Interview to a proctor that they had
a scenario where IPSec had to be configured.
It is an old interview so it may not currently be true ,
--Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel.Johnson@barclayscapital.com
[mailto:Nigel.Johnson@barclayscapital.com]
Sent: miircoles, 23 de junio de 2004 12:48
To: chenleish@online.sh.cn; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: questions
A1. I've not tried it but ip think 'no peer neighbor-route' may remove it.
A2. I don't believe it is -
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/rs/lab_exam_blueprint.html
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of cl
Sent: 23 June 2004 07:01
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: questions
1!" when i enable ospf on the frame-relay interface,and the interface use
"ip ospf network p2mp" ,it will generate the interface address as a /32
route in routing table , how to get rid of it?
2!"is IPSEC include in the R&S lab ?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:48 GMT-3