Re: Routing without routing protocol

From: Marvin Greenlee (marvingreenlee@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Jun 22 2004 - 11:34:23 GMT-3


I would say use NAT on R5.

marvin@ccbootcamp.com

--- ccie2be <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This one got me.
>
> 3550 has routing enabled but no routing protocols
> enabled.
>
> It's only path to the rest of the network is via R5.
> All other routers on the
> other side of R5 must be able to ping the 3550's
> loopback.
>
> I'm allowed to use one static route on R5.
>
> This is what it looks like:
>
> 3550 lo0 fa0/5 ------- e0/1 R5 ----- rest of
> network
>
> How do I provide reachabiltiy to the 3550's lo0
> without violating lab rules ie
> no default routes or default networks and
> no static routes except the one explicitly allowed
> here?
>
> Please tell me what I'm missing. Thanks, Tim
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:46 GMT-3