From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Tue Jun 15 2004 - 15:21:28 GMT-3
Geert,
See this paper on Frame Relay Traffic Shaping for more
information:
http://www.internetworkexpert.com/resources/01700368.htm
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geert Nijs [mailto:geert.nijs@simac.be]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:53 PM
> To: Brian McGahan; studygroup
> Subject: MINCIR vs CIR
>
> I am also confused about the deliniation between CIR and MINCIR. Can
> someone give some examples on how the lab
> would formulate these parameters ?
>
> If the lab specifies:
> "Your ISP provider will mark every packet above 48kbps
> with the DE-bit"
>
> Then CIR = 48 kbps ? Right ?
>
>
> If the lab specifies:
> "Your ISP provider will mark every packet above 48kpbs
> with the BECN-bit"
> (in the opposite direction is implicitely
> assumed here ??)
>
> Then MINCIR = 48 kbps ? Right ?
>
> Regards,
> Geert
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] Namens Brian
> McGahan
> Verzonden: dinsdag 15 juni 2004 19:27
> Aan: studygroup
> Onderwerp: RE: Bandwidth Vs MinCIR for CBWFQ
>
>
> The MINCIR value in the frame-relay map-class is simply used to
> define a worst case rate you will shape down to when the BECN bit is
set
> in frames you receive from the frame-relay network.
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk
> > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 12:29 PM
> > To: studygroup
> > Subject: Bandwidth Vs MinCIR for CBWFQ
> >
> > Hi Group
> >
> > When asked to guarantee BW foe QOS using CBWFQ on interfaces
> encapsulated
> > with frame-relay. What is the correct way to do so.
> >
> > Do I apply Bandwidth statement as I would for a HDLC interafce or
even
>
> > ethernet, or do I rely on shapping DLCI with a MIncir equal the BW
> > required.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Sam
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:41 GMT-3