From: Geert Nijs (geert.nijs@simac.be)
Date: Tue Jun 15 2004 - 14:52:39 GMT-3
I am also confused about the deliniation between CIR and MINCIR. Can
someone give some examples on how the lab
would formulate these parameters ?
If the lab specifies:
"Your ISP provider will mark every packet above 48kbps
with the DE-bit"
Then CIR = 48 kbps ? Right ?
If the lab specifies:
"Your ISP provider will mark every packet above 48kpbs
with the BECN-bit"
(in the opposite direction is implicitely
assumed here ??)
Then MINCIR = 48 kbps ? Right ?
Regards,
Geert
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] Namens Brian
McGahan
Verzonden: dinsdag 15 juni 2004 19:27
Aan: studygroup
Onderwerp: RE: Bandwidth Vs MinCIR for CBWFQ
The MINCIR value in the frame-relay map-class is simply used to
define a worst case rate you will shape down to when the BECN bit is set
in frames you receive from the frame-relay network.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 12:29 PM
> To: studygroup
> Subject: Bandwidth Vs MinCIR for CBWFQ
>
> Hi Group
>
> When asked to guarantee BW foe QOS using CBWFQ on interfaces
encapsulated
> with frame-relay. What is the correct way to do so.
>
> Do I apply Bandwidth statement as I would for a HDLC interafce or even
> ethernet, or do I rely on shapping DLCI with a MIncir equal the BW
> required.
>
> TIA
>
> Sam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:41 GMT-3