From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Jun 15 2004 - 11:37:13 GMT-3
To clarify, when I say "In the LSAs for the BitamRTC ASBR routes" I mean the
external routes that were redistributed into BitamRTC.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>
To: "RAdjakou/CFAO" <radjakou@cfao.sn>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: OSPF Trouble
> Your diagram seems to indicate that RP, RtrOyem, and OyemLS share a
physical
> network. Is it full broadcast? NBMA? Does OyemLS have and adjacency with
RP?
>
> Could you d a "show ip ospf database external" on RtrOyem. In the LSAs for
> the BitamRTC ASBR routes, is the advertising router IP that of RtrOyem or
> OyemLS?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "RAdjakou/CFAO" <radjakou@cfao.sn>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 5:57 AM
> Subject: OSPF Trouble
>
>
> > Having this scheme
> >
> > RP---(area0)--------RtrOyem--(area9)---OyemRTC
> > |
> > |
> >
> > |-(area9)---OyemLS--(area9)---BitamLS--(area9)--BitamRTC
> >
> > loopback on routers RtrOyem, OyemRTC, Oyem LS, BitamLS and Bitam RTC are
> > all in area 9.
> > On OyemRTC and BitamRTC, we redistribute into ospf addresses reserved
> > for remote access users.
> > Pb: RP has the route to addresses redistributed on OyemRTC, but not for
> > those redistributed on BitamRTC.
> > All these addresses are seen as O N2 on ABR RtrOyem.
> >
> > Cordialement/Best regards;
> > -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
> > Roberto Adjakou
> > E-mail : RAdjakou@cfao.sn
> > -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:40 GMT-3