From: Zachary Hinz (z_hinz@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 04 2004 - 16:31:20 GMT-3
If I understand the scenerio correctly, the problem is R2 doesn't run BGP so
it can't forward packets to destinations in BGP routes, right? And you
can't redistribute the BGP routes into the IGP.
If this is the case I believe they are wanting you to either policy route on
R2 or add statics.
Zac
CCIE 12419
----Original Message Follows----
From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
Reply-To: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
To: ???? <kanehori@nttdocomo.co.jp>
CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP route by way of no BGP RTR
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 15:22:50 -0300
Oops, too fast.
R2 would not know external routes...
Run BGP in R2 ?
Do you have the whole picture so we can think alternatives ?
Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
>And the problem is ?
>R1 knows (via OSPF) how to reach R3 because the link R2-R3 is part of the
>knowledge R2 has and gives to R1.
>Converselly, R3 knows via EIGRP how to reach R1.
>So BGP is up, and all are happy ? (Because R1 and R3 know how to reach next
>hop)
>
>???? wrote:
>
>>Hi,group
>>
>>I$B!G(Bm in trouble about BGP routing. Scenario is following.
>>
>>
>>R1-----------(ospf)--------R2-----------(eigrp)---------R3
>>BGP<----------------------neighbor------------------>BGP
>>
>>R1,R2:OSPF
>>R2,R3:EIGRP
>>R1,R3:BGP
>>
>>In scenario ,redistributing is prohibited.
>>R2 is not running bgp.
>>If the protocol of between R2 and R3 is ospf,
>>I would use tunneling and igp.but can$B!G(Bt $B!D(B
>>Any idea ?
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:33 GMT-3