From: LoizosCisco (david_steven2001@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Jun 03 2004 - 23:25:51 GMT-3
--- Noble - 2 BE A CCIE <noble@inserviceindia.com>
wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Recently I had such an implementation and we used
> single vtp domain and
> etherchannel between core switches. I did consult
> with TAC and they also
> agreed the configs!!!.
>
> Thanks!!!
>
> Noble
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> LoizosCisco
> Sent: 02 June 2004 19:30
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: VTP Assignment in a large Campus
> Environment
>
>
> I have two core 6509 MSFCs and a dozen Distribution
> 6509s connected to both cores. I have multiple
> stacks
> of 3550s connecting on the Distribution MSFCs which
> are trunked to the distributions (multiple vlans).
> The
> cores and distributions are connecting with layer 3.
>
> I would like to know which will be the best way to
> assign the VTP domain(s). Do I assign one VTP server
> per Distribution layer with a different domain name?
> ..or one domain name for all? Can I create only one
> VTP server for the whole network....will VTP
> information pass through layer 3 links? Any ideas
> what
> will be the best practice for VTP assignment for
> such
> a network set up?
>
> I am also concern about the connections betwen the
> two
> cores which will be etherchanneled. Should I use
> trunking with etherchannel, or should I make the
> etherchannel a layer 3 connection?
>
> I will appreciate any input.
>
> Loizos
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://messenger.yahoo.com/
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:32 GMT-3