Port Priority" Vs "Path Cost

From: samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Wed May 26 2004 - 14:47:28 GMT-3

• Next message: Edwards, Andrew M: "RE: "discard-route" command"
• Previous message: Mark Lewis: "RE: IPSEC paramenters with least overhead???"
• Next in thread: Bob Sinclair: "Re: Port Priority" Vs "Path Cost"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: Port Priority" Vs "Path Cost"
• Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: Port Priority" Vs "Path Cost"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: Port Priority" Vs "Path Cost"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Group

Though I read TAC, I am still unclear about what is different between the 2
options.
When do u prefer "Port Priority" Vs "Path Cost" and vice versa. They seem to
both achieve the same results.

TIA

Sam

• Next message: Edwards, Andrew M: "RE: "discard-route" command"
• Previous message: Mark Lewis: "RE: IPSEC paramenters with least overhead???"
• Next in thread: Bob Sinclair: "Re: Port Priority" Vs "Path Cost"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: Port Priority" Vs "Path Cost"
• Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: Port Priority" Vs "Path Cost"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "Re: Port Priority" Vs "Path Cost"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:17 GMT-3