From: Phil (theccie@gmail.com)
Date: Wed May 26 2004 - 09:54:06 GMT-3
On Wed, 26 May 2004 04:18:05 GMT, ccielab@groupstudy.com
<ccielab@groupstudy.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's CCIELab mailing list. Because the
> server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to
> authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
> spammer.
>
> PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL
> YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED.
>
> By confirming this e-mail you certify that you understand the following:
>
> 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.
>
> 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.
>
> 3. All postings become property of GroupStudy.com
>
> 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
>
> 5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
>
> 6. The message is NOT a test message.
>
> To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once
> confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations.
>
> Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
>
> ------ORIGINAL MESSAGE---------
>
> From theccie@gmail.com Wed May 26 04:18:01 2004
> Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195])
> by groupstudy.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i4Q4I1w5024057
> GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 26 May 2004 04:18:01 GMT
> Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 61so173808rnd
> for <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; Tue, 25 May 2004 21:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.11.117.12 with SMTP id p12mr145687cwc;
> Tue, 25 May 2004 21:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
> Message-ID: <d88a2b1e0405252118531c2a30@mail.gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 00:18:00 -0400
> From: Phil <theccie@gmail.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: MSDP
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hi,
>
> This is my first post to the list. I am playing with MSDP and when I
> ping the group address (225.1.2.3), I receive the first reply from
> interfaces that have joined the group from both AS's, but the second
> reply only comes from interfaces in the same AS where the source is.
>
> I still have some testing to do but I am wondering if anybody have
> seen this before.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Phil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:17 GMT-3