Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc.
From: Willem Abrie (willemmalawi@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue May 18 2004 - 14:11:50 GMT-3
- Next message: Andaluz, Danilo: "Extended Ping Data Patterns for Troubleshooting line problems"
- Previous message: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: FW: gasoline, WAY OT - but it may be of importance to"
- Next in thread: Brian McGahan: "RE: Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc."
- Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc."
- Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc."
- Maybe reply: Marvin Greenlee: "RE: Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc."
- Maybe reply: Willem Abrie: "RE: Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
In regards to the bandwidth to be configured in the LAB.
I've done a couple of the IPExpert Prep Labs, and they all seem to
indicate that when in any given scenario you have to say for instance
configure 3 Mb/s CIR, they configure it with CIR = 3000 kb/s.
My question would be if the bandwidth is 3 Mb/s, shouldn't it be 3 *
1024 kb/s, which would give 3072 kb/s instead? Are you allowed to use
the calculator on the Windows 2000 box you use to configure the 8 or 9
Routers and Switch to calculate the precise X times 1024?, or is it a
straight forward X times 1000 to get the Bandwidth amount?
Regards
Willem
- Next message: Andaluz, Danilo: "Extended Ping Data Patterns for Troubleshooting line problems"
- Previous message: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: FW: gasoline, WAY OT - but it may be of importance to"
- Next in thread: Brian McGahan: "RE: Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc."
- Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc."
- Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc."
- Maybe reply: Marvin Greenlee: "RE: Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc."
- Maybe reply: Willem Abrie: "RE: Bandwidth on CIR, BC, BE, etc."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:13 GMT-3