From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@wamnetgov.com)
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 14:37:37 GMT-3
You're missing 'async default routing' on the config. Check out:
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200107/msg00141.html
For a working example.
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services - Design & Implementation Team
13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
Herndon, VA 20171
Office: 703-480-2569
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@wamnetgov.com
PGP key:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
com
-----Original Message-----
From: Yash Bajpai [mailto:ccieyash@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 1:20 PM
To: Church, Chuck
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ospf over async interface
here is my config for the router on one side...
R3#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 862 bytes
!
version 12.2
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname R3
!
logging buffered 10000 debugging
!
ip subnet-zero
!
!
no ip domain-lookup
!
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
shutdown
!
interface Async65
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
ip directed-broadcast
encapsulation ppp
async dynamic routing
async mode dedicated
cdp enable
!
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
network 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 area 2
network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 2
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.27.65.1
no ip http server
!
!
line con 0
line aux 0
modem InOut
transport input all
speed 38400
flowcontrol hardware
line vty 0 4
exec-timeout 0 0
privilege level 15
password cisco
login
!
end
R3#
--- "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@wamnetgov.com> wrote:
> Send your int async65 configs, router ospf x configs, and the line
> aux0 configs. The cause has got to be in one of those.
>
>
> Chuck Church
> Lead Design Engineer
> CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> Wam!Net Government Services - Design & Implementation Team
> 13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
> Herndon, VA 20171
> Office: 703-480-2569
> Cell: 703-819-3495
> cchurch@wamnetgov.com
> PGP key:
>
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
> com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yash Bajpai [mailto:ccieyash@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 12:46 PM
> To: Church, Chuck
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: ospf over async interface
>
> no there are no passive default or passive interface configuration at
> all.
>
> just for the heck of it, i even enabled ip directed-broadcast (somehow
> it made sense to me that time, but of no avail)
> --- "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@wamnetgov.com> wrote:
> > That's certainly it. Do you have passive default
> in the router
> > config?
> >
> >
> > Chuck Church
> > Lead Design Engineer
> > CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> > Wam!Net Government Services - Design &
> Implementation Team
> > 13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
> > Herndon, VA 20171
> > Office: 703-480-2569
> > Cell: 703-819-3495
> > cchurch@wamnetgov.com
> > PGP key:
> >
>
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
> > com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yash Bajpai [mailto:ccieyash@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 3:29 PM
> > To: Church, Chuck
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: ospf over async interface
> >
> > yes both the routers have their async under ospf
> process. this is what
>
> > i see on both routers
> >
> > R2#sh ip ospf int async 65
> > Async65 is up, line protocol is up
> > Internet Address 192.168.1.1/30, Area 2
> > Process ID 1, Router ID 192.168.100.1, Network
> Type POINT_TO_POINT,
> > Cost: 1111
> > 1
> > Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
> > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40,
> Wait 40, Retransmit 5
> > No Hellos (Passive interface)
> > Neighbor Count is 0, Adjacent neighbor count is
> 0
> > Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s)
> >
> >
> > ****************
> >
> > R3#sh ip ospf int async 65
> > Async65 is up, line protocol is up
> > Internet Address 192.168.1.2/30, Area 2
> > Process ID 1, Router ID 192.168.10.1, Network
> Type POINT_TO_POINT,
> > Cost: 2631
> > Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
> > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40,
> Wait 40, Retransmit 5
> > No Hellos (Passive interface)
> > Index 1/1, flood queue length 0
> > Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
> > Last flood scan length is 0, maximum is 0
> > Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0
> msec
> > Neighbor Count is 0, Adjacent neighbor count is
> 0
> > Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s)
> >
> > my biggest doubt it the no hellos (PASSIVE
> INERFACE) line. that is the
>
> > issue, i think. but why??....
> >
> >
> > --- "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@wamnetgov.com> wrote:
> > > Did you do a debug on OSPF - 'deb ip ospf hello'
> > to see what going on?
> > > Are both interfaces in the OSPF process?
> > >
> > >
> > > Chuck Church
> > > Lead Design Engineer
> > > CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> > > Wam!Net Government Services - Design &
> > Implementation Team
> > > 13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250 Herndon, VA 20171
> > > Office: 703-480-2569
> > > Cell: 703-819-3495
> > > cchurch@wamnetgov.com
> > > PGP key:
> > >
> >
>
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
> > > com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Yash Bajpai [mailto:ccieyash@yahoo.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 12:23 PM
> > > To: Church, Chuck
> > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: ospf over async interface
> > >
> > > thanks for replying Chuck!
> > >
> > > The links are UP and stable. a thousand 1500
> bytes
> > PING packet goes
> > > without dropping over the async link.
> > > i have enabled CDP too and that works like a
> charm
> > too.
> > >
> > > But running OSPF or even RIP for that matter
> over
> > this link is driving
> >
> > > me nuts. the processes just dont seem to wanna
> > talk to to the
> > > neighbor.
> > > i even tried manually configuring the neigbor
> for
> > OSPF, but no luck!
> > >
> > >
> > > --- "Church, Chuck" <cchurch@wamnetgov.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Yash,
> > > >
> > > > You skipped some steps in troubleshooting the
> > > problem. Can IP
> > > > (ping) get across the link, or CDP for that
> > > matter?
> > > > If you do a show
> > > > interface, is IPCP and/or CDPCP being
> > negotiated?
> > > > If no IPCP, the OSPF
> > > > will never work. Are the interfaces staying
> up,
> > > or are they bouncing?
> > > > Oh, and you are using a standard cisco console
> > > cable, right? Ethernet
> > >
> > > > cables won't work.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chuck Church
> > > > Lead Design Engineer
> > > > CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> > > > Wam!Net Government Services - Design &
> > > Implementation Team
> > > > 13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250 Herndon,
> VA 20171
> > > > Office: 703-480-2569
> > > > Cell: 703-819-3495
> > > > cchurch@wamnetgov.com
> > > > PGP key:
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.
> > > > com
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:11 GMT-3